Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-28

WRIT - A No. 1013 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 1013 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 1013 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 1013 of 2026 Deepak Kumar Gupta .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mrityunjay Tiwari, Vijai Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Siddharth Singhal Court No. - 33 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Vijai Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State- respondents. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that though the writ petitioner had participated in pursuance of the advertisement no. 3 of 2016 for the post of Village Development Officer but he was not called in the interview. However, according to the writ petitioner, those incumbents who were not called for interview have preferred Writ-A No. 14181 of 2018 and the said writ petitions were dismissed on 27.06.2018 and an intra court appeal came to disposed of on 29.04.2019 being Special Appeal No. 1165 of 2018. The writ petitioner claims benefits which have been accorded to Ms. Khusbhu Kumari Gupta. 3. Learned Standing Counsel contends that the selection had already been done and the advertisement was of the year 2016, same sto

WRIT - A No. 1013 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam