VIKAS MATHUR vs UNION OFINDIA & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : 20th January, 2026 + W.P.(C) 13462/2023 VIKAS MATHUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv. versus UNION OFINDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kamaldeep, GP, Mr. Rahul Kr. Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA V. KAMESWAR RAO , J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 3846/2026 1. This is an application seeking an early hearing of the writ petition. 2. Noting the contents of the application, and the learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection, we allow the application. 3. The application is disposed of. 4. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties on the writ petition. W.P.(C) 13462/2023 5. The petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “In view of the above said averments and grounds and in the interest of justice the petitioner most respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to:- i) direct the Respondents to produce complete orderly Register of ‘B’ coy maintained by office of Respondent No. 1 at National Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 13462/2023 Page 1 of 5 Signed By:MAHIMA SHARMA Signing Date:23.01.2026 15:05 Industrial security academy (NISA) Hyderabad, Telangana, containing Page Nos. 72-73 and 76-77 which is having remarks of officials of Respondent No. 1 on dated 27.12.2022, 02.01.2023 and 03.01.2023 and/or; ii) direct the Respondents to refund/ reimburse the training cost of Rs. 2,57,544/- (with applicable interest) to the Petitioner in the bank account of petitioner details of which are provided by the petitioner in the email application dated 08.08.2023, which is duly served to the respondents and/or;…” 6. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner was