USHA RANI vs SEEMA & ORS

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 27.01.2026 FAO 383/2018 USHA RANI .....Appellant Through: Mr. R.M. Sinha, Mr. Prateek Sinha, Ms. Namita and Ms. Nandini, Advocates. versus SEEMA & ORS .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The present appeal, filed under Order XLIII Rule 1 (r) CPC, impugns the order dated 04.07.2018 passed by the learned ADJ, East District, Karkardooma Courts, in Misc. DJ No. 1106/2016 [formerly CS(OS) No. 198/2011], whereby the Trial Court declined to initiate contempt proceedings against respondent no. 1 and declined to declare the Sale Deed dated 16.03.2011 qua the suit property as non est, the same having been entered into between the respondents/defendants after the passing of the injunction order dated 31.01.2011. 2. Briefly, the appellant, who is the plaintiff before the Trial Court, had preferred a suit for declaration and permanent injunction. In the plaint, it was averred that the late Smt. Maya Devi, the mother of the appellant/plaintiff as well as respondent/defendant no. 1, had executed a Will dated 23.05.2008 in favour of respondent no. 1, which was sought to be 3. The