USHA RAMBHAU HUGE vs THE COMMISSIONER, GREATER MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND 3 ORS

Judgment text excerpt

204.OS.WP.669.2022.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 669 OF 2022 Usha Rambhau Huge Age : 57 Years, Occ : Retired Digitally Residing at 401/’A’ Pawanputra CHS. signed by VINA Ltd. Sector 5 Charkop, Kadivali (West), VINA ARVIND ARVIND KHADPE Mumbai 400067. ….Petitioner KHADPE Date: 2026.02.03 10:02:31 +0530 Versus 1. The Commissioner Greater Mumbai Municipal Corporation, Municipal Head Office, Mahapalika Marg Mumbai, Maharashtra 400001. 2. Administrative Officer Ed. H/E Ward Greater Mumbai Municipal Corporation Mumbai, Plot No. 137, TPS IV Road No. 2 Prabaht Colony, Santracurze (E) Mumbai 55. 3. Chief Secretary School and Sports Department Government of Maharashtra. Mantralaya, Mumbai – 400032 Through Government Pleader. 4. The Accounts Officer (FGR) office of Account Officer (FGR) Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika Head Office Annex Building, 6th Floor, Mahapalika Marg Fort, Mumbai 400001. ….Respondents ---- Mr. Vishwanath Patil a/w. Mr. Harshwardhan Karande a/w. Advocate Guruling Samagond i/b. Mr. Deepak Pandey, for the Petitioner. Mr. Pratik Garde, for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4/BMC. Mr. Mahendra Sale, Head Clerk, AO (School) H East ---- Sufiyan Syed - PA 1 of 10 204.OS.WP.669.2022.odt CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 29th JANUARY, 2026 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties. 2. The Petitioner has put forth the Prayer Clauses (C), (D) and (E), are as under : (C) That in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Direction or Order direc