Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-01-05

UPINDER KAUR vs HARISH KUMAR JAWA

Citation / case number
RC.REV.-154/2024 2026:DHC:22
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
UPINDER KAUR
Respondent
HARISH KUMAR JAWA

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: December 23, 2025 % Pronounced on: January 05, 2026 + RC.REV. 154/2024 CM APPL. 32836/2024, CM APPL. 72985/2025, CM APPL. 81539/2025 UPINDER KAUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aman Preet Singh Rahi, Advocate Versus HARISH KUMAR JAWA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rishi Sood and Mr. Sagar Choudhary, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE JUDGMENT 1. The respondent/ landlord1 filed an Eviction Petition under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 19582 before the learned Senior Civil Judge-cum-Rent Controller, South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi3 seeking eviction of the petitioner/ tenant4 from the shop situated in property no. 662-C/8, Govindpuri, Kalkaji, New Delhi as per site plan5. 2. Succinctly put, the case of the respondent before the learned RC was that the subject premises was let out to the petitioner by the erstwhile 1 Hereinafter referred to as ‘respondent’ 2 Hereinafter referred to as ‘DRC Act’ 3 Hereinafter referred to as ‘RC’ 4 Hereinafter referred to as ‘petitioner’ 5 Hereinafter referred to as ‘subject premises’ RC.REV. 154/2024 Page 1 of 8 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:BABLOO SHAH Signing Date:05.01.2026 15:58:40 owner-landlord Smt. Kailash Rani Kapoor for the purposes of selling woollen sweaters and garments in the name of ‘Lucky Variety Store’. Subsequently, in the year 2001, Smt. Kailash Rani Kapoor, out of property bearing no.662-C/8, Govindpuri, Kalkaji, New Delhi admeasuring 600 sq. yards, sold 200 sq. yards, comprising the subject premises, to the respondent. In furtherance thereof, Smt. Kailash Rani Kapoor executed Agreement to Sell, GPA, Will, and other allied documents, all dated 23.10.20016, in the favour of respondent and also hande

UPINDER KAUR vs HARISH KUMAR JAWA · Niyam