Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-01-19

SUBHASH @ SUBHASH CHAND vs STATE OF GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-215/2026 2026:DHC:449
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SUBHASH @ SUBHASH CHAND
Respondent
STATE OF GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 19.01.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 215/2026, CRL.M.A. 1746/2026 & 1747/2026 SUBHASH @ SUBHASH CHAND .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Kumar and Mr. Avinash Sharma, Advocates versus STATE OF GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with IO/Inspector Lalit Kumar, PS DIU/East CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No.220/2025 of PS Ghazipur for offence under Section 420/467/468/471/120B/34 IPC. 2. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP for State assisted by IO/Inspector Lalit Kumar. 3. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the accused/applicant is as follows. The now deceased mother of the complainant de facto was defrauded by the accused/applicant in the month of June-July 2024 by the BAIL APPLICATION 215/2026 Page 1 of 4 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb48 35d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2e ee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.01.19 18:10:52 -08'00' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:19.01.2026 18:12:10 accused/applicant, who was working as a property dealer and got their house bearing No. B-127, G.D. Colony, Mayur Vihar, Delhi vacated and sold the same, after depositing some money in the bank account of mother of the complainant de facto and depositing the remaining entire sale consideration in his company’s account. Thereafter, the accused/applicant shifted the complainant de facto and her mother to a rented flat

SUBHASH @ SUBHASH CHAND vs STATE OF GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI · Niyam