Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-01-08

STATE vs SONU @ PARMINDER

Citation / case number
CRL.A.-1327/2015 2026:DHC:346-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
STATE
Respondent
SONU @ PARMINDER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 8th January, 2026 Uploaded on: 15th January, 2026 CRL.A. 1327/2015 STATE .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP with Ms. Divya Yadav, Adv. versus SONU @ PARMINDER .....Respondent Through: Mr. S.B. Dandapani, Adv. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh J., 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter, ‘CrPC’) challenging the acquittal of the Respondent- Sonu @ Parminder i.e., the Accused vide order and judgment dated 9th January, 2013 (hereinafter, ‘impugned judgment’) passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, (Special Fast Track Court)-01, West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. 3. This appeal arises out of FIR No.255/2010 dated 9th December, 2010 registered at Police Station-Nihal Vihar under Sections 363/376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter, ‘IPC’), which was registered and dealt with as Sessions Case No.1/2013. The Respondent- Mr. Sonu @ Parminder i.e., the 4. The allegation in the present case was that around 05:00 A.M. on 5 th December, 2010, near RZF-80