Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-01-13

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. vs DINESH KUMAR JAIN & ANR.

Citation / case number
REVIEW PET.-1/2026 2026:DHC:235
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
Respondent
DINESH KUMAR JAIN & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: 07.01.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 13.01.2026 + REVIEW PET. 1/2026 in FAO 53/2023, CM APPL 570/2026 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu and Ms. Ishika Jain, Advocates for GNCTD. Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Advocate, ASG with Mr. Sameer Vashist, Standing Counsel, Mr. Anshuman, Mr. Naman, Mr. Amit Gupta, Mr. Yashwardhan Sharma, Advocates. IPS Prashant Gautam, DCP-Shahdara Inspector Dharmendra SHO Raj Kumar, P.S. Gandhi Nagar ACP Mahender Singh versus DINESH KUMAR JAIN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashwani Kr. Sharma and Mr. P.K. Dixit, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA JUDGMENT CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J. 1. This petition under Section 114 and Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (the 2. According to the review petitioners, the impugned judgment suffers from errors apparent on the face of the record, warranting exercise of review jurisdiction. It is urged that the finding in the impugned judgment treating the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC as barred by limitation is contrary to the binding directions is