Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-06

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 509 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 509 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 509 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 509 of 2025 Rama Kant Tiwari .....Appellant(s) Versus U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd. Thru. Managing Director Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Dinesh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shishir Jain Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. (C.M. Application No.1 of 2025) 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 2. Heard. 3. There is a delay of 58 days in filing the appeal. Counsel for the opposite parties has orally objected the prayer for condonation of delay. 4. We have gone through the affidavit filed in support of application for condonation of delay and find that the reasons mentioned therein are sufficient. Accordingly, we condone the delay, which is not inordinate. The application is accordingly allowed. (Order on memo of appeal) 5. After hearing the parties and perusing the records ultimately what comes out is that though the petitioner-appellant was engaged as Helper in 1985 by the opposite parties and a service book was also prepared, however, the said service book at some subsequent point

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 509 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam