SMT. VANDANA RANA vs SH. BAL SINGH RANA & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 23rdJANUARY, 2026 IN THE MATTER OF: + I.A. 33003/2025 IN CS(OS) 593/2019 SMT. VANDANA RANA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Kunwar Karan, Mr. Shekhar Mann and Mrs. Srishti Bajpai, Advocates versus SH. BAL SINGH RANA & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. A.K. Thakur, Mr. Naresh Kumar Beniwal, Mr. Rishi Raj and Mr. NingthemOinam, Advocates for D-1. Mr. Birender Singh and Mr Sujeet Kumar, Advocates for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD JUDGMENT I.A. 33003/2025 1. This is an application on behalf of Defendant No.1 under Order VII Rule 11 read with Order X Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking rejection of plaint. 2. The present Suit is one for permanent injunction, partition with possession and for rendition of accounts. Plaintiff No. 1 and Defendants No. 2, 3, and 4 are children of Defendant No. 1 and Late Smt. Barfo Devi. The present dispute arises out of inheritance of properties of Late Smt. Barfo Devi. Signature Not Verified Signed By:HARIOM CS(OS) 593/2019 Page 1 of 11 SINGH KIRMOLIYA Signing Date:24.01.2026 20:31:27 3. The facts as stated in the Plaint to the extent necessary and relevant, are as under: i. Late Smt. Barfo Devi, owned multiple valuable immovable properties across Delhi and Haryana. As detailed in the Plaint, late Smt. Barfo Devi was the absolute owner of the following immovable properties: a. C-137, Pushpanjali Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi (300 sq. yards) b. C-141, Gali No. 7, Majlis Park, Adarsh Nagar, Delhi (200 sq. yards) c. Plot No. 96, Pocket 27, Sector-24, Rohini, Delhi (250 sq. yards, Commercial) d. Ground Floor, 8CD, Aggarwal Chambers, Pitampura, Delhi (3,750 sq. ft., Commercial) e. Agricultural Land, Village Kandela, District Jind, Haryana (15 acres 5 kanals 15 m