SMT SUDHA SHARMA vs STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on : 26.09.2025 Judgment delivered on : 06.01.2026 + CRL.REV.P. 627/2023 SMT SUDHA SHARMA .....Petitioner versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Yash Gupta and Ms. Khushi Verma, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with SI Mahabir, PS EOW. Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kashish Jain, Advocate for R-2 (through VC). R-2 in person (through VC). CORAM HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN JUDGMENT 1. The present petition is filed under Section 397/398 & 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter ‘CrPC’) seeking setting-aside of the judgment dated 13.04.2023 (hereinafter ‘the Impugned Judgment’), passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (hereinafter ‘ASJ’) in Criminal Appeal Bearing No. 483/2018, vide which the appeal of the revisionist/Smt. Sudha Sharma was dismissed on the ground of non- Signature Not Verified Signed By:SHIKHA SEHGAL CRL.REV.P. 627/2023 Page 1 of 9 Signing Date:06.01.2026 19:16:23 maintainability of the appeal. 2. Succinctly stated, one partnership firm in the name of M/s Young Men's corporation was allotted an immovable property by the Delhi Development Authority (‘DDA’) bearing no. C-131, Phase-II, Mayapuri, New Delhi (hereinafter ‘subject premises/property’) with the five co-sharers namely Smt. Shanti devi, Smt. Sudha Sharma, Smt. Ashawati, Smt. Laxmi Devi and Dr. Chanderkant. It is alleged that Dr. Chandrakant sold his portion/share to Respondent No.2/Sh. M.L. Sharma and Smt. Lakshmi Devi sold her share to Revisionist/Sudha Sharma. 3. It is the case of the revisionist/Smt. Sudha Sharma that on 18.03.2004, Respondent No.2/Sh. M.L. Sharma