Delhi High Court · 2026-01-28
SH SAMUNDER SINGH AND OTHERS vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
- Citation / case number
- CRL.M.C.-700/2026 2026:DHC:738
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- SH SAMUNDER SINGH AND OTHERS
- Respondent
- THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
Judgment text excerpt
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 28th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 700/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2794/2026 SH SAMUNDER SINGH AND OTHERS .....Petitioners versus Through: Ms. Vandana Kumar, Advocate along with petitioners-in-person THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for State/R-1 Mr. Mann Sehgal and Mr. Arnav Jain, Advocates for R-2 along with R-2 in person SI Arti Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) CRL.M.A. 2794/2026 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 700/2026 1. All the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 331/2018 registered at Police Station Begum Pur, Delhi under Sections 323/341/354/354A/34 Indian Penal Code. 2. Charge-sheet has already been filed and accused are facing trial for the aforesaid offences only. 3. The case in hand is at the stage of prosecution evidence. 4. It is also apprised by the learned counsel for the parties that incident in Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 700/2026 1 THAPLIYAL Signing Date:30.01.2026 10:48:19 question was reported to the police by both the side and on the basis of report lodged by petitioner no. 5 herein with the police, a cross-case was registered i.e. FIR No. 334/2018, Police Station Begum Pur. Such cross-case is directed against three accused persons and aforesaid case is also listed for prosecution evidence. 5. Learned counsel for petitioners and respondent no. 2 submit that both the matters have been amicably resolved and both the parties have sorted out all their disputes. They refer to Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 30.08.2025. As per consolidated terms of settlement, petitioners herein have agreed to make payment of Rs. 50,000/- to complainant (respondent no. 2