SH. MADAN PAL SINGH AND ANR vs THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 29th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 478/2026&CRL.M.A. 1921/2026 SH. MADAN PAL SINGH AND ANR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pardeep Kumar, Mr. Ashish Karawal and Mr. Gourav Goswami, Advocates. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. All the petitioners seek quashing of FIR.No.0155/2019 under Sections 308/341/323/34 IPC P.S. Karawal Nagar. 2. The abovesaid FIR was registered on the basis of a complaint filed by respondent No.2-Mr. Praveen Kumar and on the basis of the order passed under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. 3. Initially, the chargesheet was directed against six accused persons but four accused persons were, reportedly, discharged and the trial is presently going on with respect to the two accused persons i.e. both the petitioners herein, who have been charged for offences under Section 308, 323, 341 and 34 IPC. 4. The matter has been amicably settled between the parties and respondent No. 2, who is present in Court, and reiterates the terms of settlement as recorded in MoU dated 17.12.2025. He submits that the dispute was merely with respect to some plastering to be done outside the common wall and, it was only on Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CRL.M.C. 478/2026 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:31.01.2026 12:47:49 account of some provocation and misunderstanding, that he was compelled to file complaint before the learned Magisterial Court. 5. He submits that both the parties are residents of same street and due to intervention of the family members, well wishers and respectable members of the Society, the disputes have been amicably resolved and he is, now, not in