Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-01-21

SAUD NASIR AND ANR vs LATE MOHAMMAD SULTAN THROUGH HIS LR AND ANR.

Citation / case number
CM(M)-161/2026 2026:DHC:511
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SAUD NASIR AND ANR
Respondent
LATE MOHAMMAD SULTAN THROUGH HIS LR AND ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 21st January 2026 CM(M) 161/2026 SAUD NASIR AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Visheshwar Shrivastav, Adv. versus LATE MOHAMMAD SULTAN THROUGH HIS LR AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 4012/2026 & CM APPL. 4013/2026 (Exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. CM(M) 161/2026 & CM APPL. 4011/2026 (for Stay) 3. The present petition has been filed by petitioners under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, seeking the following relief: “a) Issue notice to the Counsel for Respondent No. 1 and other Respondents; and b) Set aside the order dated 12/01/2026 and expunge the Examination in Chief & Cross Examination of OW-3 [Petitioner No. 2]; and c) Direct the Ld. ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (South-East) to conduct a de nova Examination in Chief of Petitioner No. 2” 4. Heard. Record perused. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the evidence of the OW-3 was record in his absence as he was unable to appear in the court

SAUD NASIR AND ANR vs LATE MOHAMMAD SULTAN THROUGH HIS LR AND ANR. · Niyam