SANYA BHASIN vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 12th November, 2025 Pronounced on: 06th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 7984/2025 SANYA BHASIN W/o Himanshu Bhasin D/o Sh. Puneet Bhasin GF-8, Ankur Apartments, Sector-5, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad Uttar Pradesh-201005 ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Atul Jain, Advocate. versus 1. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through SHO P.S. Paharganj Delhi-110055 ....Respondent No.1 2. HIMANSHU SARPAL S/o Sh. Kamal Sarpal WZ-92, 3rd Floor, Ramesh Nagar, Delhi-110035 ….Respondent No.2 Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State. Ms. Shefali Menezes, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. Petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as „B.N.S.S.‟) (corresponding to Section 482 of CRL.M.C. 7984/2025 Page 1 of 28 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:06.01.2026 17:12:26 the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as „Cr.PC‟)), has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner, Ms. Sanya Bhasin for challenging the Order dated 13.08.2025 whereby the learned ASJ-04, Delhi, has upheld the Order dated 18.04.2024 of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (Mahila Court), Delhi summoning the Petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as „IPC‟). 2. Briefly stated, Criminal Complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. was filed for the offences under Section 182/192/195/196/312/379/384/ 406/420/500/506/34/120B of IPC by Mr. Himanshu Sarpal, the Complainant/ Respondent No. 2 who is the husband of the Petitioner. 3. The Complainant/ Respondent No.2 stated in his Complaint that he met the Petitioner, Ms. Sanya Bhasin (Accused No. 1) on Sha