SANDEEP DHAWAN & ORS. vs AMARJEET SINGH KOHLI

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: December 11, 2025 % Pronounced on: January 05, 2026 + RC.REV. 81/2022, CM APPL. 20510/2022, CM APPL. 68528/2022 SANDEEP DHAWAN & ORS. ...Petitioners Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kunal Madan, Mr. Gurmukh Singh Arora and Ms. Ankita Singh, Advocates. Versus AMARJEET SINGH KOHLI ...Respondent Through: Mr. Jugal Wadhwa, Mr. Rishabh Wadhwa, Mr. Raghav Goyal, Mr. Vatsal S. Chadha, Advocates. + RC.REV. 82/2022, CM APPL. 20515/2022 ASHOK KUMAR SAPRA ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kunal Madan, Mr. Gurmukh Singh Arora and Ms. Ankita Singh, Advocates. Versus AMARJEET SINGH KOHLI ...Respondent Through: Mr. Jugal Wadhwa, Mr. Rishabh Wadhwa, Mr. Raghav Goyal, Mr. Vatsal S. Chadha, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE JUDGMENT 1. Common arguments have been addressed in the above two petitions, which are arising out of a common factual matrix. As such, both the above RC.REV. 81 /2022 & RC.REV. 82 /2022 Page 1 of 11 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:BABLOO SHAH Signing Date:05.01.2026 15:58:40 petitions are being taken up together. 2. The respondent/ landlord, in both the petitions, filed two eviction petitions bearing RC ARC Nos.54/2021 and 53/2021 against the petitioner(s)/ tenant(s) qua the two premises being the middle shop1 and the corner shop2 respectively, on the Ground Floor of property bearing No.H- 25, Main Market, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi-110 027 under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 19583. Eviction was sought for the first subject premises on the ground that the landlord required the same for his younger son, Mr. Manpreet Singh, to attain financial independence and carry on the business of purchase and sale of old mobil