SAKSHAM SAGAR SAWLANI & ANR. vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI, & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 16th January, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 164/2026 & CRL.M.A. 1500/2026 SAKSHAM SAGAR SAWLANI & ANR. ....Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Bedi and Dr. Anil Kumar Gupta, Advocates versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI, & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC (Criminal) with Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate for R-1/State Mr. Imran Khan, Mr. Inam-ul-Haq and Mr. Gulshan Kumar, Advocates for R-2 Ms. Simran Sawlani, R-2-in-person (Through VC) W/SI Aarushi Rajput, PS Kirti Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No. 210/2024 PS Kirti Nagar under Sections 465/471/120B IPC. 2. Briefly stated, the grievance of the complainant (respondent no. 2 herein) is that her brother-in-law (devar) and his son had opened one savings account in her name by illegal means and without her knowledge and permission. Her such complaint resulted in registration of aforesaid FIR. 3. Investigation is still going on. Signature Not Verified W.P.(CRL) 164/2026 1 Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:17.01.2026 15:46:58 4. However, in the interregnum, both the parties have amicably settled the matter and respondent no. 2 is no longer desirous of pursuing her aforesaid FIR. In settlement deed dated 10.12.2025, it has been mentioned that since parties are close relatives, with the intervention of well-wishers and common friends, they have now, amicably, resolved their disputes and misunderstandings and, therefore, complainant i.e. respondent no. 2 does not want to pursue aforesaid matter and seeks to withdraw the same. 5. Affidavit of respondent