Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Bombay High Court · 2026-01-13

SACHIN SHANTARAM MHASKAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Citation / case number
WP/453/2006
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
SACHIN SHANTARAM MHASKAR
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

LSP 1 905 wp 453.06.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 453 of 2006 Sachin Shantaram Mhaskar Mumbai … Petitioner V/s. 1. State of Maharashtra 2. Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, 3. Secretary, Social Justice, Mantralaya, Mumbai. 4. Commissioner/Director of Tribal Research and Training Institute 5. Dy. Collector, Sindhudurg 6. Competent Authority and Director of Technical Education 7. Principal, Sardar Patel Institute of Technology … Respondents. Mr. R.K.Mendadkar a/w. Priyanka Shaw, Jayshree Mendadkar, Siddhant Sawai, Jagdish Kawale, Prajakta Pashtre Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. N.C. Walimbe, Addl. G.P. a/w. Mr. A.K.Naik, AGP for the Respondents-State. CORAM : M.S. KARNIK & Digitally LATA SUNIL signed by LATA SUNIL PANJWANI S.M. MODAK, JJ. PANJWANI Date: 2026.01.21 16:45:27 +0530 DATE : 13th January 2026. LSP 2 905 wp 453.06.doc Oral Judgment (Per M.S. Karnik, J) : Our attention is invited to order dated 12 th December 2025 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. 2. We have heard Mr. Mendadkar, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. Walimbe, the learned AGP appearing for the Respondents-