ROMA JAIN vs M/S R.K. STOCKHOLDING PVT.LTD

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 7th January, 2026 Pronounced on: 12th January, 2026 + RSA 112/2024 & CM APPL. 37166/2024 MS. ROMA JAIN W/o Sambhav Jain R/o C-1/3D-1, Model Town-III, Delhi-110009. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Gurbaksh Singh and Mr. Arjun Dhamija, Advocates. versus M/S R.K. STOCKHOLDING PVT.LTD Through its Director Corporate Office at: A-7, Block B-1, Mohan Co-operative Industrial Estate, Mathura Road, New Delhi-110044. .....Respondent Through: Mr. J. P. Pathak, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. Regular Second Appeal has been filed on behalf of the Appellant Roma Jain (Defendant in the main Suit) against the Judgment dated 28.03.2024 whereby the learned ADJ-04, Saket Courts, New Delhi has upheld the Ex-parte Decree in the Civil Suit No.1677/2019 dated Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ANIL RSA 112/2024 Page 1 of 8 KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:12.01.2026 17:22:07 19.12.2019, whereby the Suit of the Plaintiff/ Respondent was decreed in the sum of Rs.69,792/- along with interest @ 6% per annum. 2. The brief facts are that a Suit for Recovery of Rs.69,792/- along with interest @ 18% per annum was filed by the Respondent against the Appellant, who failed to appear despite service and was proceeded ex-parte vide Order dated 09.12.2019. 3. The Plaintiff/Respondent examined PW1 Navdeep Varshney Director/AR of the Respondent Company who proved the requisite documents. On the appreciation of the documents and evidence, the Trial Court decreed the Suit of the Respondent and held he was entitled to recovery of Rs.69,792/- along with interest @ 6% per annum. 4. Subsequently, the Execution proceedings were initiated by the Respondent, in which the Appellant appeared. Thereaf