Bombay High Court · 2026-01-29
RAVINDRA GOPAL KADU vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PRIN. SECRETARY, HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION DEPT. AND ORS
- Citation / case number
- WP/9749/2023
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Petitioner
- RAVINDRA GOPAL KADU
- Respondent
- THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PRIN. SECRETARY, HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION DEPT. AND ORS
Judgment text excerpt
207-WP-9749-2023(FO).odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9749 OF 2023 Ravindra Gopal Kadu, Age- 60 years, Having residence at- ‘Ajinkya’, Lakaki Campus, Alpine Wood, Tungarli, Lonavala, Dist. Pune-410403 ….Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Principal Secretary, Higher & Technical Education Department, Having office at Mantralaya Annex, Mumbai-431032 2. The Director of Higher Education Maharashtra State, Having office at Central Building 3, BJ, Medical Road, Agarkar Nagar, Pune-411 001 3. The Joint Director of Higher Education, Pune Division, Having office at-17, Dr. Ambedkar Road, Near St. Mathew Marathi Church, Camp, Pune 411001 4. Savitribai Phule Pune University, Kartikeya 1 of 10 207-WP-9749-2023(FO).odt Through its Registrar, Having office at - Ganeshkhind, Pune-411007. 5. Dr. B.N. Purandare Arts, Smt. S.G. Gupta Commerce & Smt. S. A. Mithaiwala Science College Through the Principal, Having office at- Valvan, Lonavala Tal-Maval, Pune-410403. 6. Lonavala Education Trust, C/O Dr. B.N. Purandare Art, Smt. S.G. Gupta Commerce & Smt. S.A. Mithaiwala Science College Through its Secretary Having office at Valvan, Lonavala, Tal-Maval, Pune-410403 ….Respondents ---- Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate, i/b. Mr. Akshay S. Karlekar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. P.P. Kakade, Addl. G.P. a/w Mr. S.L. Babar, AGP for Respondent No.1 – State. Ms. Gayatri Kale h/f. Mr. Rajendra Anbhule, for the Respondent No.4. ---- CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 29th JANUARY, 2026 Kartikeya 2 of 10 207-WP-9749-2023(FO).odt Final Order :- (Per :- Ravindra V. Ghuge, J.) :- 1. The Petitioner before us is aggrieved that the Management is declining to issue the No Dues Certificate and is not forwarding