Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Bombay High Court · 2026-01-17

RAMESH @ BHAIJAN MOHAN PATIL vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Citation / case number
APEAL/1276/2023
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
RAMESH @ BHAIJAN MOHAN PATIL
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

:1: 903-APEAL-1276-23-J.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1276 OF 2023 Ramesh @ Bhaijan Mohan Patil …..Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra .….Respondent ----- Mr. Aniket Vagal, Advocate a/w. Savvy Kolhekar, Juhi Kadu for the Appellant. Ms. Kranti Hiwrale, APP for the Respondent-State. ----- CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 16th & 17th JANUARY, 2026 JUDGMENT : [PER SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.] 1. The Appellant has challenged the judgment and order dated 30.4.2022 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Borivali Division, Dindoshi, Goregaon, Mumbai in Sessions Case No.12/2011. There were in all nine accused in this case. During pendency of the trial, the original accused No.4 and the original accused No.9 passed away. Therefore, the trial was abated as far as they were concerned. The Appellant was the original accused No.2. The accused Nos.5 to 8 were acquitted from all the charges. The other three accused, including the present Appellant, were convicted. Those accused are as follows : 1 of 26 Deshmane(PS) :2: 903-APEAL-1276-23-J.odt (i) The accused No.1 – Harun Abdul Rashid Shaikh, (ii) The

RAMESH @ BHAIJAN MOHAN PATIL vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA · Niyam