RAMAN KUMAR vs MS SKYTEX UNMANNED AREIAL SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED

Judgment text excerpt

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 28.01.2026 + ARB.P. 397/2025 RAMAN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A. Mishra, Mr. Sahil and Mr. Nidish, Advocates. versus MS SKYTEX UNMANNED AREIAL SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chinmaya Seth, Mr. A.K. Seth and Ms. Palak Mathur, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % J U D G E M E N T (Oral) 1. The present Petition, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, has been filed seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator for the adjudication of disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 20.12.20222. 2. The MoU contains the Arbitration Clause at Clauses 11 and 12, which read as under: “11. Dispute Resolution Any disputes or differences involving this MOU whenever arising shall be resolved mutua ly by the both parties within 30 days of receipt of the written notice that regard from the aggrieved party. Failing amicable settlement, the matter shall be resolved through an arbitration tribunal comprising of sole arbitrator appointed by 1 Act 2 MoU Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARVINDER KAUR ARB.P. 397/2025 Page 1 of 5 BHATIA Signing Date:31.01.2026 11:46:34 mutual consent by the parties hereto and in the event of the parties fail to mutually appoint an arbitrator, he shall be appointed by Court of competent jurisdiction. The award of the Arbitrator shall be final and binding on the parties. 12. Law/Jurisdiction The engagement shall be subject to Indian laws. The Parties to this MOU submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in New Delhi for settling any dispute arising out of the engagement hereunder” 3. Material on record indicates that since disputes had arisen between the part