Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-01-28

RAMAN KUMAR vs MS SKYTEX UNMANNED AREIAL SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED

Citation / case number
ARB.P.-397/2025 2026:DHC:699
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RAMAN KUMAR
Respondent
MS SKYTEX UNMANNED AREIAL SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 28.01.2026 ARB.P. 397/2025 RAMAN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A. Mishra, Mr. Sahil and Mr. Nidish, Advocates. versus MS SKYTEX UNMANNED AREIAL SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chinmaya Seth, Mr. A.K. Seth and Ms. Palak Mathur, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % J U D G E M E N T (Oral) 1. The present Petition, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, has been filed seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator for the adjudication of disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 20.12.20222. 2. The MoU contains the Arbitration Clause at Clauses 11 and 12, which read as under: “11. Dispute Resolution Any disputes or differences involving this MOU whenever arising shall be resolved mutua ly by the both parties within 30 days of receipt of the written notice that regard from the aggrieved party. Failing amicable settlement, the matter shall be resolved through an arbitration tribunal comprising of sole arbitrator appointed by 1 Act 2 MoU 12. Law/Jurisdiction The engagement shall be subject to Indian laws. The P