RAJKUMAR PRAVINKUMAR MEHTA vs THE APEX GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE

Judgment text excerpt

wp-2985-2025.doc Digitally signed by TRUSHA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TRUSHA TUSHAR TUSHAR MOHITE MOHITE Date: 2026.01.19 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION 17:47:16 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO.2985 OF 2025 Rajkumar Pravinkumar Mehta .. Petitioner Versus The Apex Grievance Redressal Committee & Others .. Respondents. Mr.Janay Jain a/w Mr. Ashwin S. Tripathi, Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. Aparna D. Vhatkar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1-AGRC Ms.Ravleen Sabharwal a/w Ms. Aarushi Yadav and Mr. Prakhar Tandon, Advocate for the Resondent Nos. 2 & 3-SRA Mr.Shashikant Surana a/w Mr. Madhur Surana, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4 CORAM: FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J. DATE: JANUARY 19, 2026 P.C. For the reasons stated in the Judgement dated 19 th January 2026, passed in Writ Petition No. 2892 of 2025, the following Orders are passed :- (i) The Writ Petition is dismissed. The Rule is discharged; Mohite 1/2 wp-2985-2025.doc (ii) As far as the grievance of the Petitioner about the allocation of the permanent alternate accommodation to be allotted to him in the Rehabilitation Building is concerned, he is at liberty to seek such remedy as may be permissible to him in law. If any such Application is made, it will be decided on its own merits without being influenced by the present Order; (iii) In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order at to costs. [FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.] Mohite 2/2