RAJ RANI & ORS. vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO P.S MOHAN GARDEN & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 14th January, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 325/2023 RAJ RANI & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Advocate. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO P.S MOHAN GARDEN & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for the State with Mr. Alok Sharma and Mr. Suyash Varshney, Advocates. SI Sumit and ASI Murli, P.S. Mohan Garden. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners, who are facing trial in FIR No. 0699/2021 dated 24.12.2021 registered at P.S. Mohan Garden under Sections 420/34 IPC, seek quashing of FIR, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. 2. Learned APP for the State, however, at the very outset informs that since the offence in question was compoundable in nature, when the matter was taken up by the learned Trial Court on 31.10.2025, after recording statement of the complainant, the matter was compounded and as a necessary corollary, the accused have been acquitted of offences under Section 420/34 IPC. Thus, the file has been directed to be consigned to the record room after due compliance and now nothing is pending before the learned Trial Court. 3. A copy of order dated 31.10.2025 has also been shown which is Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(CRL) 325/2023 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:15.01.2026 18:10:00 directed to be taken on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has joined the proceedings through video conferencing and confirms the abovesaid development. 5. In view of the above, since the matter has already been compounded, no further action is required to be passed in the present petition. 6. Petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms. (MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE JANUARY 14, 2026/ss/js Signatu