PRATIMA MAHAJAN vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI ) AND ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 21.01.2026 CRL.M.C. 528/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2125/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2126/2026 PRATIMA MAHAJAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Armaan Roop Sharma and Ms. Priya Pachouri, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI ) AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State with SI Rajak Ahmed, PS C.R. Park CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioner has sought to invoke powers of this Court under Sectoin 482 CrPC and Article 227 of the Constitution of India with regard to an order passed by the Court of Sessions which was exercising revisional jurisdiction. 2. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner at length, I am unable to find the present petition maintainable. Rather, the present petition is completely frivolous. 3. For convenience, the prayer clause of the petition is extracted below:- “a) Allow the present petition and set aside the findings and CRL.M.C. 528/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4af ec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacc a, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 4. Despite being repeatedly called upon, learned counsel for petitioner is unable to show any legal provision or judicia