Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-01-15

PRABHAT KUMAR ORS vs THE STATE GOVT OF N C T OF DELHI THROUTH IS SHO PS SUNLIGH COLONY & ANR.

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-202/2026 2026:DHC:415
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
PRABHAT KUMAR ORS
Respondent
THE STATE GOVT OF N C T OF DELHI THROUTH IS SHO PS SUNLIGH COLONY & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 15th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 202/2026 & CRL.M.A. 769/2026 PRABHAT KUMAR ORS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hrithik Manchanda and Pawan Bhatia, Advocates. versus THE STATE GOVT OF N C T OF DELHI THROUTH IS SHO PS SUNLIGH COLONY & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with SI Vivek Tomar, P.S. Sunlight Colony. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The present petition seeks quashing of FIR No.294/2021 dated 06.06.2021, registered at Police Station Sunlight Colony, Delhi for commission of offences under Sections 498A/406//34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Petitioner No.1 got married to respondent No.2 on 08.11.2019, as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. No offspring is born from the said wedlock. 3. However, immediately after marriage, on account of certain temperamental differences, the couple started residing separately. 4. On the basis of complaint made by respondent No.2, the abovesaid FIR was registered. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CRL.M.C. 202/2026 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:17.01.2026 12:48:50 5. Admittedly, petitioner No.1 herein had also sought divorce on ground of cruelty, and since there was no participation from the side of his wife in such proceedings, petitioner No.1 obtained ex-parte divorce on 28.08.2023. 6. However, thereafter the parties, in order to sort out their differences, approached Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, New Delhi on 12.08.2025, and were able to dissolve all their disputes amicably. 7. Respondent No.2 has also relinquished and forgone all her claims/rights towards maintenance (past, present and future),

PRABHAT KUMAR ORS vs THE STATE GOVT OF N C T OF DELHI THROUTH IS SHO PS SUNLIGH COLONY & ANR. · Niyam