OM PRAKASH (SINCE DEAD) THROUGH LRS vs RAJBIR KAUR & ANR

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: December 03, 2025 % Pronounced on: January 15, 2026 + RC.REV. 130/2025, CM APPL. 170/2018, CM APPL. 45589/2018 CM APPL. 36866/2019 OM PRAKASH (SINCE DEAD) THROUGH LRS AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Archana Midha, Advocate with petitioner in person Versus RAJBIR KAUR & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yajur Bhalla and Mr. Ashutosh Tiwari, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE JUDGMENT 1. The respondents/ landlords1 instituted an Eviction Petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Restriction Rent Act, 1949 read with East Punjab Urban Restriction Rent Act (Extension to Chandigarh) Act, 1974 before the learned Rent Controller, Chandigarh seeking eviction of the petitioners/ tenants2 from back half of half portion of 2nd Floor of S.C.O. No.15, Sector 17 E, Chandigarh i.e. One-fourth portion of the 2nd floor3. Thereafter, pursuant to order dated 20.06.2006 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Transfer Petition no.356 of 2003, the said 1 Hereinafter referred to as “respondents” 2 Hereinafter referred to as “petitioners” 3 Hereinafter referred to as “subject premises” RC.REV. 130/2025 Page 1 of 10 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:BABLOO SHAH Signing Date:15.01.2026 16:50:51 Eviction Petition was transferred from learned Rent Controller, Chandigarh to the learned SCJ cum RC Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi4. 2. It was the case of the respondents before the learned RC that they were/ are the owners/ landlords of S.C.O. No.15, Sector 17 E, Chandigarh, and had inducted petitioner no.1 as the tenant in the subject premises at a monthly rent of Rs.250/- payable in advance for the purposes of running an electronics business under the name and style “M.P. Electronics”. The respondents