Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Bombay High Court · 2026-01-12

NARENDRA SINGH CHAWARA vs HEMANGINI KUMARI PRITHVI RAJ SINGH CHAWARA

Citation / case number
APP/82/2024
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
NARENDRA SINGH CHAWARA
Respondent
HEMANGINI KUMARI PRITHVI RAJ SINGH CHAWARA

Judgment text excerpt

Mr. Narendra Singh Chawara, S/o Ram Singh Chawara vs. Mrs. Hemangini Kumari Prithvi Raj Singh Chawara __________________________________________________ APP-82-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO. 82 OF 2024 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 56 OF 2019 Digitally VINA signed by VINA ARVIND KHADPE IN ARVIND Date: KHADPE 2026.01.19 16:24:45 +0530 TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 2278 OF 2018 Mr. Narendra Singh Chawara, S/o Ram Singh Chawara, Aged 83 years, Residing at S-29, Hanuman Nagar, Khatipura, Sirsi Road, Vaishali Nagra, Jaipur,Rajasthan. …APPELLANT ~ VERSUS ~ Mrs. Hemangini Kumari Prithvi Raj Singh Chawara, Aged 47 years, Occupation – Service, Hindu, Residing at S-10, Hanuman Nagar, Khatipura, Sirsi Road, Vaishali Nagra, Jaipur, Rajasthan …RESPONDENT A PPEARANCES : for the Appellant Mr. Kevic Setalvad a/w Mr. Abhishek Sawant, Mr. Ameya Kulkarni, Mr. Amit Pradhan & Ms. Ujwala Deshmukh i/b. Pradhan and Rao. for the Respondent Mr. Sunip Sen a/w Mr. Udaybhanu Singh i/b. Zain A. K. Najam – Es – Sani. CORAM : B. P. COLABAWALLA & AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR, JJ. Page 1 of 32 JANUARY 12, 2026 Mr. Narendra Singh Chawara, S/o Ram Singh Chawara vs. Mrs. Hemangini Kumari Prithvi Raj Singh Chawara __________________________________________________ APP-82-2024 RESERVED ON : 28th November 2025. PRONOUNCED ON : 12th January 2026. JUDGMENT (Per Amit Satyavan Jamsandekar J.):- 1. By the present Appeal, the Appellant has challenged the Order dated 29 th February 2024, passed by the Learned Single Judge in Notice of Motion No. 56 of 2019 (the Impugned Order). By the Impugned Order, the Learned Single Judge has dismissed the Notice of Motion filed by the Appellant and held that the Appellant has no caveatable interest and directed the Testamentary Depart

NARENDRA SINGH CHAWARA vs HEMANGINI KUMARI PRITHVI RAJ SINGH CHAWARA · Niyam