MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI vs VIDYAVATIDEVI RAMNARAYAN SAHANI

ppn 1 43.fa-1807.11.doc N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 001. ….Appellant (Original Defendant) V/s. Vidyavatidevi Ramnarayan Sahani Age 55 years, an adult, Indian inhabitant of Bombay, Having structure situated at CTS No.950 (pt.), Near Link Road, Dahisar (West), Mumbai – 68. .…Respondent (Original Plaintiff) ---- Ms. Pallavi Khale i/by Ms. Komal Punjabi for the Appellant-MCGM. Mr. J. G. Kadam i/by Mr. B.P. Shukla for the Respondent. ---- CORAM : JITENDRA JAIN, J. DATED : 27 January 2026 Judgment : 1. This appeal is filed by the appellant-Corporation challenging the order dated 8 December 2009 passed by the City Civil Court whereby notice dated 4 February 2008 under Section 354A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (for short ‘the Act’) was quashed and set aside. 2. The only issue which arises for my consideration is whether the City Civil Court was justified in quashing the notice under Section 354A of the Act? 3. The respondent is in occupation and possession of a structure situated at CTS No.950. It is the case of the respondent that she had ppn 2 43.fa-1807.11.doc initiated the work of plastering of walls of the suit structure. The