MRS. NIKHAT PARVEEN ABDUL WAHEB SHAIKH vs UNION OF INDIA, SECRETARY AND ORS.

42-WP-10082-2017.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10082 OF 2017 014. ...Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India (Notice to be served upon) Secretary, Defence Department, New Delhi. 2. D.G.T.E. Raksha Sampada Bhawan, New Delhi, Ulaan Batar Marg, Delhi Cantonment, New Delhi : 110 010. 3. Kirkee Cantonment Board, Kirkee, Pune : 411 003. 4. The Chief Executive Officer, Kirkee Cantonment Board, Kirkee, Pune : 411 003. ...Respondents ***** Mr.Subhash V. Gutte, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.Rishabh Jadhav i/b. Parinam Law Associates, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. ***** CORAM : M.S.KARNIK & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATE : 13th JANUARY 2026 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : M.S.KARNIK, J.) :- Satish Sangar 1/9 42-WP-10082-2017.doc 1. By this Petition, the challenge by the petitioner, a teacher working in a school run by the Cantonment Board, is to the communication refusing to grant her invalidated pension under Rule 38 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 (“Pension Rules”, for short). The petitioner, vide undated communication, informed the Chief Executive Officer of the Cantonment Board that though her pension was started and in fact,