MOHAMMAD SAMIM vs STATE & ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 29th January, 2026 CRL.M.C. 738/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2938/2026 MOHAMMAD SAMIM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. P. Pratap and Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State. Mr. Sandeep Chauhan, Advocate for Victim. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner herein seek quashing of FIR No. 0143/2021 dated 20.03.2021, registered at P.S. Nangloi, for commission of offences under Sections 376/384 IPC and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 (POCSO), along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Though there were specific allegations regarding sexual assault by the complainant (respondent No.2 herein), however, when she made statement on oath under Section 164 Cr.P.C. she did not divulge anything incriminating against the accused and based on her such statement, the petitioner had, earlier also, filed petition seeking quashing of FIR in question. 3. Such petition i.e. CRL.M.C.6767/2023 was taken up by learned 2024. Though the learned Si