Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-01-12

MCDONALDS INDIA LTD vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR

Citation / case number
W.P.(CRL)-2294/2017 2026:DHC:228
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MCDONALDS INDIA LTD
Respondent
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 2nd December, 2025 Pronounced on: 12th January, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 2294/2017, CRL.M.A. 12975/2017, CRL.M.A. 13878/2017 MCDONALDS INDIA LTD Office at: 202-206, Tolstoy House No. 15, Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi, 110001 Through Mr. Vivek Kumar Authorized Representative .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Sr. Adv., Ms. Stuti Gujral, Adv., Mr. Vishwajeet Singh Bhati, Adv., Mr. Tasnimul Hassan, Adv., Ms. Priti Verma, Mr. Vipin Kumar, Advocates. Versus 1. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through PS Economic Offences Wing Lodhi Colony/Qutub Instt. Area New Delhi .....Respondent No. 1 2. DEEPAK KHOSLA S/o R.P. Khosia R/o D-367 Defence Colony New Delhi 110024 .....Respondent No. 2 Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for State along with Adv. Kshitiz Garg, Adv. Ashvini Kumar, Adv. Nitish Dhawan, Adv. Chavi Lazarus, Adv. Manan Wadhwa, Adv. Luv Mahajan. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ANIL W.P.(CRL) 2294/2017 Page 1 of 8 KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:12.01.2026 17:41:26 1. The present Petition has been preferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C), by the Petitioner Company, McDonalds India Pvt. Ltd. to quash and set aside the Impugned Order dated 20.05.2017 directing the Advocate for Petitioner to disclose the source of documents filed in the proceedings before the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, as well as all proceedings consequential thereto, including the Order dated 22.07.2017 issuing Notice to the Advocates in the proceedings. 2. The central issue arising for consideration in this Petition is whether a Revisional Court, while exercising jurisdiction

MCDONALDS INDIA LTD vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR · Niyam