MAYANK JAIN, PROPRIETOR OF MAHAVEER UDYOG vs M/S ATULYA DISCS PVT. LTD. & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 09.01.2026 + CS(COMM) 412/2025 MAYANK JAIN, PROPRIETOR OF MAHAVEER UDYOG .....Plaintiff versus M/S ATULYA DISCS PVT. LTD. & ORS .....Defendants Advocates who appeared in this case For the Plaintiff : Mr. R.P. Yadav and Mr. Riju Mani Talukdar, Advocates. For the Defendants : Dr. Amit George, Mr. Manish Gandhi, Mr. Vaibhav Gandhi, Ms. Muskan Gandhi, Mr. Dushyant Kishan Kaul and Ms. Rupam Jha, Advocates for D-1 to D-3 Ms. Rohini Sharma and Ms. Chanchal Sharma, Advocates for D-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA JUDGMENT TEJAS KARIA, J I.A. No. 11309/2025 (U/O XXXIX R-1& 2 of the CPC) 1. This is an Application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) seeking an interim injunction restraining Signature Not Verified CS(COMM) 412/2025 Page 1 of 14 Signed By:NEELAM SHARMA Signing Date:09.01.2026 19:04:07 infringement of the Mark, ‘ / TIGER GOLD BRAND (“Plaintiff’s Mark”), infringement of Copyright, passing off, misrepresentation, dilution, unfair competition by directly / indirectly selling, advertising, mentioning, and / or using the Mark ‘TIGER PREMIUM BRAND/ ’ (“Impugned Mark”). 2. Vide Order dated 06.05.2025, the Parties were referred to Delhi High Court Medication and Conciliation Centre, Delhi High Court to amicably resolve the disputes between them, however, the Parties were unable to settle the dispute and thereafter, Notice was issued in the present Application vide Order dated 28.08.2025. 3. Vide Order dated 12.11.2025, after conclusion of arguments by the Parties, the judgment was reserved. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF: 4. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff made the following submissions: 4.1. The Plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the Plai