MANISH AGGARWAL & ORS. vs RAM NARAYAN PANDEY & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 21st January, 2026 + CS(OS) 278/2018, I.A. 7760/2018, I.A. 14223/2022 & I.A. 15479/2022 MANISH AGGARWAL & ORS. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Surender Gupta, Adv. along with Plaintiff Mr. Manish Aggarwal in person. Mob: 9811196644 Email: [email protected] versus RAM NARAYAN PANDEY & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Satyavan Kudalwal and Mr. Aakash Kudalwal, Advs. for D- 7(LRs) Defendant No. 1 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J (ORAL): 1. Settlement Agreement dated 24th September, 2025, has been received from the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs submits that the plaintiffs had purchased the plot of land measuring 450 sq. yards, in Khasra No. 1614/1195/558, located in the Village of Bahapur, Tehsil Kalkaji, New Delhi. 3. He submits that the plaintiffs had purchased the said land in question from the original owner, i.e., Legal Representatives (“LRs”) of Sh. Ratan Lal Gupta. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CS(OS) 278/2018 Page 1 of 8 By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:23.01.2026 10:16:07 4. He further submits that out of the 450 sq. yards of the land in question, which was purchased by the plaintiffs, only 270 sq. yards had been handed over to the plaintiffs. 5. Thus, by way of the present suit, the plaintiffs had sought for the remaining 180 sq. yards of the land in question. 6. It is submitted that the remaining land was in the possession of defendant nos. 1 to 7, which was part of the land measuring 900 sq. yards, in possession of defendant no. 1. 7. Attention of this Court has been drawn to the order dated 29 th March, 2022, wherein, defendant nos. 2 to 7, were transposed as plaintiffs. 8.