Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-01-22

M/S TELEXCELL INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED vs M/S TATA ADVANCED SYSTEMS LIMITED

Citation / case number
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)-832/2025 2026:DHC:646
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
M/S TELEXCELL INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED
Respondent
M/S TATA ADVANCED SYSTEMS LIMITED
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 22.01.2026 O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 832/2025 M/S TELEXCELL INFORMATION SYSTEMS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rizwan, Ms. Sachi Chopra and Ms. Kriti, Advocates. versus M/S TATA ADVANCED SYSTEMS LIMITED ....Respondent Through: Mr. Vijay Purohit, Mr. Shivam Pandey and Mr. Tanmay Arora, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGEMENT (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeking extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal for a further period of at least six months for making and publishing the arbitral award in Case Ref. No. DIAC/2118/07-18. BRIEF FACTS: 2. The learned Sole Arbitrator entered reference in the said arbitration in the year 2019, and pleadings were completed. The 3. Since the statutory period prescribed under Section 29A of the Act was expiring, the Respondent herein had earlier approached this Court by filing O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 38/2021, which came to be decided vide Order dated 01.02.2021, whereby this Court extended the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator up to 01.06.2021, taking note of de