Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-01-15

M/S SHREEJI POLYFAB PRIVATE LIMITED vs M/S GOLDSTONE INTERNATIONAL

Citation / case number
TR.P.(C.)-156/2025 2026:DHC:350
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
M/S SHREEJI POLYFAB PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent
M/S GOLDSTONE INTERNATIONAL

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: November 19, 2025 % Pronounced on: January 15, 2026 + TR.P.(C.) 156/2025, CM APPL. 72486/2025, CM APPL. 72623/2025 M/S SHREEJI POLYFAB PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naresh Gupta, Mr. Shantanu Aggarwal and Mr. Rachit Gumber, Advs. Versus M/S GOLDSTONE INTERNATIONAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rishabh Kapur, Adv. (Through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE JUDGMENT 1. By virtue of the present petition, filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19081, the petitioner seeks transfer and consolidation of Suit being CS(Comm.) No.568/2023 “Goldstone International vs. Shreeji Polyfab Pvt. Ltd.” pending before the Court of learned District Judge, Commercial-03, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts2, along with the counter claim being CS(Comm.) No.110/2025 pending before this Court. 2. Succinctly put, it is the case of the petitioner that respondent had instituted a Suit being CS(Comm.) No.568/2023 for recovery against petitioner before the learned Trial Court, wherein the petitioner, after being 1 Hereinafter as “CPC” 2 Hereinafter as “learned Trial Court” TR.P.(C.) 156/2025 Page 1 of 6 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:BABLOO SHAH Signing Date:15.01.2026 16:50:51 served filed his written statement. Further, since a counter claim seeking recovery of Rs.2,03,56,985/- was also instituted by petitioner against the respondent being CS(Comm.) No.47/2024 before the learned Trial Court, as the valuation thereof exceeded the pecuniary jurisdiction, learned Trial Court vide order dated 15.04.2024 was pleased to return the same to be instituted before this Court having the pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the same. 3. Pursuant thereto, even though the petitioner had instituted the

M/S SHREEJI POLYFAB PRIVATE LIMITED vs M/S GOLDSTONE INTERNATIONAL · Niyam