KONE ELEVATOR INDIA PVT. LTD. vs V3S INFRATECH LIMITED

Judgment text excerpt

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 19.01.2026 + ARB.P. 964/2025 KONE ELEVATOR INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunal Kher and Mr. Manuj Gautam, Advocates. versus V3S INFRATECH LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. Praveen Kumar Singh, Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, Md. Ziauddin Ahmad, Mr. Abhishek Mehra and Ms. Ankita Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL) 1. The present petition, under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Act”], seeks the appointment of an Arbitrator on the basis of an Agreement bearing reference No. KEI/0050/0001488193 dated 13.02.2012 [“Agreement”] and the alleged Arbitration Clause, namely, Clause A-5 of the said Agreement, which reads as under: “A-5) Arbitration In the event of difference or dispute arising out of, under or in connection with this agreement, over the rights of obligation of parties hereto, the dispute or difference shall be referred to the Arbitration of a Sole Arbitrator to be appointed by KONE Elevator India Private Limited. The Venue of the Arbitration (sic) shall be at Delhi shall have the jurisdiction in relation to the Arbitration and the Provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 shall be applicable to such Arbitration.” Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed ARB.P. 964/2025 Page 1 of 4 By:HARVINDER KAUR BHATIA Signing Date:24.01.2026 11:12:38 2. However, as is manifest from the record and as is also admitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that, the parties thereafter entered into another Agreement in form of a work order dated 15.02.2012 [“Work Order”], and on which basis they have agreed to govern the relationship between the parties. 3. Learned c