KAUSHLENDER BHARDWAJ vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 21.01.2026 + W.P.(CRL) 222/2026 KAUSHLENDER BHARDWAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajnish, Mr. Rahul and Mr. Kuldip Singh, Advocates. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V Khatri, ASC with IO/ASI Deshpal, PS Narela. Mr. Deepak, Advocate, for injured with injured in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 639/2022 of Police Station Narela for the offence under Section 279/337 IPC on the ground that complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioner. 2. Learned ASC accepts notice and on instructions of IO/ASI, Deshpal Singh submits that State has no objection if this petition is allowed. 3. The complainant de facto identified by the IO also is present along with his counsel and accepts notice. W.P.(CRL) 222/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, Signature Not Verified KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff8 01e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.01.21 18:02:06 -08'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:21.01.2026 18:09:13 4. Broadly speaking, the allegation against the petitioner is that he was driving his car in a rash and negligent manner and hit against the complainant de facto causing him injuries, so the FIR under Section 279/337 IPC was registered. 5. I have spoken with the complainant de facto and he submits that he does not wish to pursue the trial and he has settled the disputes with the petitioner. 6.