KAUSHAL KUMAR YADAV & ANR. vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 30th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 798/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3157/2026 KAUSHAL KUMAR YADAV & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ajay Paul, Ms. Geeta Paul and Mr. Ravi Verma, Advocates. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State with SI Pawan Kumar, PS Prashant Vihar. Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 415/2025 dated 01.07.2025, registered at P.S. Prashant Vihar, Delhi, under Sections 110/351(2)/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 (corresponding Sections 308/506 of IPC), along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Both the petitioners are vegetable-sellers and so is the complainant (respondent No.2 herein). 3. On the date of incident, a quarrel had taken place for the reason that the petitioners were furious as to why the complainant was selling vegetables, on a relatively cheaper rate. He was beaten up with rod and danda. Though, the injuries were found to be simple in nature, yet keeping in mind the overall facts of the case, the abovesaid FIR was registered for attempt to commit Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 798/2026 1 THAPLIYAL Signing Date:31.01.2026 15:00:09 culpable homicide. 4. Charge-sheet has also been filed for the abovesaid penal provision. 5. It is now informed that both the parties have entered into settlement and, therefore, the injured i.e. complainant Niraj Kumar @ Roshan Kumar, is no longer interested in pursuing his present complaint. 6. Respondent No.2 is present and is duly identified by the Investigating Officer i.e. SI Sh. Pawan Kuma