JITENDER BHATI @ HAPPY THROUGH HIS PAIROKAR AND WIFE MS MONIKA JINDAL vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 17.01.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 4571/2025 JITENDER BHATI @ HAPPY THROUGH HIS PAIROKAR AND WIFE MS MONIKA JINDAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravindra Narayan, Mr. Ranjan Kumar and Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with Inspector Jaspal Singh, PS Burari Mr. Umesh Sharma, Advocate for victim CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 1360/2015 of PS Burari for offence under Section 365/302/201/120B/34 IPC read with Sections 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act. 2. On last date, after arguments were advanced by learned counsel for accused/applicant and by learned APP, adjournment was requested by BAIL APPLICATION 4571/2025 Page 1 of 4 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, Signature Not Verified KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801 e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.01.17 16:15:09 -08'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:17.01.2026 16:20:41 complainant de facto as he wanted to engage a counsel to assist the learned prosecutor. Accordingly, today I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for complainant de facto. 3. Broadly speaking, the prosecution case is as follows. On 29.10.2015, the complainant de facto lodged a missing report as regards his brother Pawan Kumar. Thereafter, on 01.11.2015, FIR was registered by police on the statement of the complainant