Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-01-27

JES AND BEN GROUPO PVT LTD vs SHAKTI TRADING CO

Citation / case number
CM(M)-187/2026 2026:DHC:634
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
JES AND BEN GROUPO PVT LTD
Respondent
SHAKTI TRADING CO

Judgment text excerpt

$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : 27th January, 2026 + CM(M) 187/2026 JES AND BEN GROUPO PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hemant Sharma, Advocate. versus SHAKTI TRADING CO .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pankaj, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 5261/2026 (for delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay of 24 days in re-filing the present petition is condoned. 3. Accordingly, the application is disposed of. CM APPL. 5260/2026 (for exemption) 4. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CM(M) 187/2026 & CM APPL. 5259/2026 (for stay) 5. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the orders dated 10th September, 2025 and 27th October, 2025 passed by the learned Trial Court in Civil Suit (Comm.) 1634/2022. Vide order dated 10th September, 2025, the evidence of the petitioner/ defendant was closed and vide order dated 27th October, 2025, Signature Not Verified Signed By:MANISHA CM(M) 187/2026 Page 1 of 2 RAJPUT Signing Date:28.01.2026 11:56:20 right of the petitioner to cross-examine PW-1 was closed. 6. Learned counsel for the respondent appeared on advance notice and accepted notice. 7. Heard. Record perused. 8. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing the petition insofar as it seeks to set aside the order dated 10th September, 2025. However, he presses the relief seeking the grant of one more opportunity to the petitioner to cross-examine PW-1. 9. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that it is in the intere

JES AND BEN GROUPO PVT LTD vs SHAKTI TRADING CO · Niyam