INTEGRATED TECHNO SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. vs PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GNCTD, THROUGH THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WR-II/M-112N, PWD

Judgment text excerpt

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 27.01.2026 + ARB.P. 48/2026 INTEGRATED TECHNO SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC along with Mr. Aryan Dhaka and Ms. Nandini Aggarwal, Advocates. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GNCTD, THROUGH THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WR-II/M-112N, PWD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nitin Kumar, Panel Counsel (GNCTD) (Civil) along with Mr. Shiv Kumar Gupta, AE. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % J U D G E M E N T (Oral) 1. The present petition, filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [“Act”], seeks the appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes inter se the parties arising from the Agreement bearing No. 28/EE/CRMD M-112(N) WR-2/2020-21 [“Agreement”]. 2. The material on record indicates that the arbitration clause is envisaged under the Agreement, being Clause No. 25, which reads as under: Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARVINDER KAUR ARB.P. 48/2026 Page 1 of 8 BHATIA Signing Date:29.01.2026 16:08:06 “Settlement of Disputes & Arbitration Clause 25 Except where otherwise provided in the contract, all questions and disputes relating to the meaning of the specifications, design, drawings and instructions here in before mentioned and as to the quality of workmanship or materials used on the work or as to any other question, claim, right, matter or thing whatsoever in any way arising out of or relating to the contract, designs, drawings, specifications, estimates, instructions, orders or these conditions or otherwise concerning the works or the execution or failure to execute the same whether arising during the progress of the work or after the cancellation, termination, completion or abandonment thereof shall be dealt with a