Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-01-31

INNOCENTI SA vs EXAMINER OF TRADEMARKS & ANR.

Citation / case number
C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM)-76/2024 2026:DHC:784
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
INNOCENTI SA
Respondent
EXAMINER OF TRADEMARKS & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgement Delivered on: 31.01.2026 C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 76/2024, I.A. 45128/2024&I.A. 45132/2024 INNOCENTI SA .....Appellant versus EXAMINER OF TRADEMARKS & ANR. .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Mr. Chander M. Lall, Senior Advocate with Dr. Sheetal Vohra, Mr. Rahul Dwivedi, Mr. Sridharan Rajan Ramkumar, Ms. Annanya Mehan, Mr. Ashutosh & Ms. Sakshi Rathore, Advocates. For the Respondents : Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC along with Mr. Mayank Sansanwal & Mr. Om Ram, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr. Jayant Mehta, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Apoorva Maheshwari, Ms. Bhavya Gupta & Ms. Priyanshi Bhageria, Advocates for Respondent No.4. W.P.(C)-IPD 54/2025, CM 223/2025 & CM 224/2025 AUGUST VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS .....Respondent 1. 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA JUDGEMENT TEJAS KARIA, J 1. By way of this common Judgement, C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 76/2024 (“Appeal”), W.P.(C)-IPD 54/2025 (“WP 54”) and W.P.(C)-IPD 56/2025 (“WP 56”) are decided in terms of the agreement between the Parties as recorded in order dated 16.10.2025. 2. The Appeal has b