Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-01-28

HARBIR SINGH YADAV vs SUMAN & ORS.

Citation / case number
CS(OS)-651/2019 2026:DHC:770
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
HARBIR SINGH YADAV
Respondent
SUMAN & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 28th JANUARY, 2026 IN THE MATTER OF: + I.A. No. 9218/2025 IN CS(OS) 651/2019 HARBIR SINGH YADAV .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Arun Baali and Ms. Arisha Ahmad, Advocates versus SUMAN & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. S.S.Parasher, Ms. Shruti Sharma, Advocate for Defendant No.1 to 5 Mr. Anish Dhingra, Mr. ArihantNowlkha, Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advs for D-7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD JUDGMENT (ORAL) I.A. No. 9218/2025 1. This Application under Order XVIII Rule 1 of the CPC has been filed by the Plaintiff for a direction to the Defendants to lead evidence before the Plaintiff. 2. The instant Suit is one for partition of a property bearing Plot No. 143, Pocket-B, Sector-26, Rohini, Delhi, admeasuring 335 square metres (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Suit Property’). 3. The case set up by the Plaintiff is that the Suit Property was allotted by the Delhi Development Authority/Defendant No.7 herein (hereinafter 4. It is stated that on the death of Late Shri Ram Mehar Yadav, his legal heirs, namely, the Plaintiff herein, Late Satish Yadav and Urmila Yadav/Defendant No. 6, were entitled to an undivided 1/3rd share in the