Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-01-27

GULZAR vs THE STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-4481/2025 2026:DHC:630
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
GULZAR
Respondent
THE STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~1 & 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 27.01.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 4481/2025 GULZAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.K. Mishra, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SHO/Inspector Vishwanath, PS NDRS. + BAIL APPLN. 4515/2025 GULZAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.K. Mishra, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SHO/Inspector Vishwanath, PS NDRS. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR Nos. 106/2025 & BAIL APPLICATIONS 4481/2025 & 4515/2025 Page 1 of 4 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4556 9af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, Signature Not Verified KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155709 96b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.01.27 17:15:21 -08'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:27.01.2026 17:26:50 107/2025 of PS New Delhi Railway Station for offence under Section 305(c)/317(c)/3(5) BNS. 2. To begin with, last order passed in these bail applications is extracted below: “1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 106/2025 and FIR No. 107/2025 of PS New Delhi Railway Station for offence under Section 305(c)/317(c)/3(5) BNS. 2. At the outset, it is shocking to hear from learned counsel for accused/applicant that during pendency of these bail applications, the accused/applicant has already been released on bail by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned. On further query, it is disclosed by lea

GULZAR vs THE STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI · Niyam