Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-22

FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 9 of 2026 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 9 of 2026 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 9 of 2026 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 9 of 2026 Akanksha Yadav .....Appellant(s) Versus Amit Kumar Yadav .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ishan Baghel, Deepti Singh, Nishchal Verma, Shekhar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sumit Kumar Srivastava Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Ms. Dipti Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ishan Baghel, learned counsel for the appellant has instruction not to press the appeal, as it suffers from certain errors and a fresh appeal would be required to be filed 3. The appeal is dismissed as not pressed as aforesaid. 4. The office is directed to give back the certified copies of the orders, which have been filed with the appeal as per the rules of the Court. . (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) January 22, 2026 Anuj Singh Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 9 of 2026 at Lucknow · Niyam