Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-16

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 925 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 925 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 925 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 925 of 2026 Harnam Singh Bundela .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shantanu, Vikram Singh Shrivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 66 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Shivam Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri Shantanu, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anjani Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the informant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.54 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 117(2), 103(1) B.N.S., Police Station Balabehat, District Lalitpur, during the pendency of trial. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that similarly placed co-accused person Ajay has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 12.01.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.399 of 2026, as such, since the role of the applicant is identical to that of co- accused, who has already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of pari

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 925 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam