Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-07

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 45718 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 45718 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 45718 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45718 of 2025 Mukhtar .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mir Sayed Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 66 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Mir Sayed, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ramapati Triptathi, learned counsel for the informant and Sri R.M. Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 149 of 2025, under Sections 103(1), 61(2) B.N.S., Police Station Jajmau, District Kanpur Nagar, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has further argued that the applicant has been nominated in the FIR on the basis of suspicion only. There is no other cogent evidence against him or any of the co-accused persons. Subsequently, in the statement of the informant recorded u/s 180 B.N.S.S., he has stated that Mohd. Suvaib and Mohd. Sameer had called the son of the informant an

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 45718 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam