Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-05

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 45273 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 45273 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 45273 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45273 of 2025 Kalu @ Mukesh @ Chhotu Bhaiya .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raghuvansh Misra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 66 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. Ifrah Islam, learned State Law Officer and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 0237 of 2025, under Sections 103(1), 3(5), 61(2) B.N.S., Police Station Gandhi Park, District Aligarh, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant is not named in the FIR. His name has come up for the first time in the confessional statement of co-accused person, which has no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. Even subsequently, three witnesses have been cropped up, namely, Ram Kumar, Meena Devi and Vishal, who have stated that they could hear the name of the applicant from the co-accused persons Himanshu @ Kali and Lata Raghav. There is neith

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 45273 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam