Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-01-09

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 45121 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 45121 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 45121 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45121 of 2025 Abdul Samad @ Ballu .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Jaiswal, Rajendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 66 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Jaiswal, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Sanjeev Singh, learned A.A.G. assisted by Sri Deepak Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No. 143 of 2024, under Section 103(1) of BNS and Sections 25/4 of Arms Act, Police Station- Kotwali, District - Meerut, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case and has no concern whatsoever with the alleged offence as mentioned in the FIR. It is further submitted that the so-called eye-witnesses, namely, Mohd. Shoaib Qureshi and Lala, are not natural or true eye-witnesses, as they are stated to have reached the place of occurrence only aft

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 45121 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam